Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Perusahaan Dalam Penggeledahan Ponsel Pribadi Karyawan

Authors

  • Joshua Evandeo Irawan Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i1.823

Keywords:

Smartphone, ITE Law, Inspection

Abstract

The use of sophisticated smartphones in the world of work often causes problems such as those that occur in PT. X, where a worker, Mrs. A, in early 2022, was forced to give her smartphone to be searched on orders from the Director of PT. X, named Mrs. B. The search warrant came as the alleged hate speech expressed by Mrs. A about Mrs. B to fellow workers via Whatsapp text message. The writing of this article aims to answer the big question of whether companies are authorized to check their employees' mobile phones in terms of the positive law in Indonesia, namely the ITE Law. The writing of this article uses the dogmatic normative juridical method by approaching it through statutes approach and conceptual approach. The final result of this article is that Mrs. A's smartphone is the personal property of Mrs. A where all data in the cellphone is private property protected by Article 26 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law jo Article 30 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law while Mrs. B as the Director of PT. X can conduct a search because Mrs. B is not classified as an investigator as explained in Article 43 of the ITE Law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi, dan Wahana Komputer Semarang. Kamus Lengkap Dunia Komputer. Yogyakarta: Andi Yogyakarta, 2002.

Anisah, Amelia Putri, dan Eko Nurisman. “Cyberstalking: Kejahatan Terhadap Perlindungan Data Pribadi Sebagai Pemicu Tindak Pidana.” Krtha Bhayangkara 16, no. 1 (2022): 163–176.

Czubik, Agnieszka. “‘The Right to Privacy’ by S. Warren and L. Brandeis – The Story of a Scientific Article in the United States.” Ad Americam 17 (2016): 211–219.

Daun, Repsi. “Prinsip-Prinsip Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penangkapan, Penahanan, Dan Penggeledahan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 10, no. 04 (2021): 150–151.

Deshaini, Liza, dan Muhammad Nur Amin. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penggeledahan Tanpa Izin Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) Liza Deshaini, Muhammad Nur Amin Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda” 28, no. September (2022): 153–160.

Gusti Yarmi, Ika Lestari,. “Pemanfaatan Handphone Di Kalangan Mahasiswa.” Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan 31, no. 1 (2017): 55.

Haryani Putri, Anggreany, dan Endang Hadrian. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Penipuan Jual Beli Online.” Krtha Bhayangkara 16, no. 1 (2022): 131–138.

Indonesiabaik.id. “66,3% masyarakat Indonesia Memiliki Smartphone.” Indonesiabaik.id, 2017. https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/663-masyarakat-indonesia-memiliki-smartphone-8.

Irawan, Joshua Evandeo. Bahan Ajar Cyberlaw Cybercrime. Surabaya, 2021.

Irawan, Joshua Evandeo, Andrian Nathaniel, dan Steven Jonathan. “Juridical Analysis About Cyberbullying Cases by Child Perpetrators Against Child Victims.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 1 (2022).

Kuffal, H.M.A. Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktik Hukum. 9 ed. Malang: UMM Press, 2010.

Lamintang, P.A.F. Pembahasan KUHAP : Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana & Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.

Marpaung, Leden. Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. 8 ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=49216&lokasi=lokal.

Natamiharja, Rudi. “Perlindungan Data Privasi dalam Konstitusi Negara Anggota ASEAN.” Hak Konstitusional (2019): 183–197.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia. 9 ed. Bandung: Sumur Bandung, 1977.

Sarnita Sadya. “Pengguna Smartphone Indonesia Terbesar Keempat Dunia pada 2022.” Newzoo.com, 2023. https://dataindonesia.id/digital/detail/pengguna-smartphone-indonesia-terbesar-keempat-dunia-pada-2022.

Soraja, A. “Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Privasi Dan Data Pribadi Dalam Prespektif Ham.” Seminar Nasional-Kota Ramah Hak Asasi … (2021): 20–32. https://conference.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/semnas/article/view/168%0Ahttps://conference.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/semnas/article/download/168/140.

Vinet, Luc, dan Alexei Zhedanov. “A ‘missing’ family of classical orthogonal polynomials.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, no. 8 (2011): 56–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.055%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.04.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.127252%0Ahttp://dx.doi.o.

Warren, Samuel D, Louis D Brandeis, Harvard Law Review, dan No Dec. “The Right to Privacy Today.” Harvard Law Review 43, no. 2 (1929).

Yosepha Pusparisa. “Daftar Negara Pengguna Smartphone Terbanyak, Indonesia Urutan Berapa?” Katadata, 2021.

Yuwinanto, Helmy Prasetyo. “Privasi online dan keamanan data.” Palimpsest, no. 031 (2015).

Downloads

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Perusahaan Dalam Penggeledahan Ponsel Pribadi Karyawan. (2024). KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 17(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i1.823