Examining The Shift in The Procedural Law of The Administrative Court: Discourse on Changes in Society and The Judiciary

M. Ikbar Andi Endang; Moh. Fadli; Istislam; Dewi Cahyandari

doi:10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1188

Authors

M. Ikbar Andi Endang Brawijaya University
Moh. Fadli Brawijaya University
Istislam Brawijaya University
Dewi Cahyandari Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1188

Keywords:

Administrative Court, Procedural Law, Legal Shifting

Abstract

Shifting the procedural law of the Administrative Court is a necessity. This happened as an effort to respond to the absence of arrangements for resolving administrative disputes and government administration regulated in sectoral laws. The Supreme Court through Perma responded to the void in legislations regarding the procedures or procedures for this matter. To analyze the context, this study uses a legal approach, a historical approach, and a conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, it can be seen that there is a shift in the conservative setting from the procedural law of the Administrative Court towards a procedural law system with a progressive setting nuance. This can be seen with changes in procedures, both in terms of reducing the levels of examination, reducing the process of proceedings, and determining the grace period for the event process. With this progressive system, the renewal of the case administration system and the electronic trial go hand in hand. Interpreting the dynamics between law and the judiciary with changes in society, the momentum for changes in the procedural law of the Administrative Court with social changes in society accommodates legal certainty and the principles of a simple and fast trial. Consequently, the shift in the character of the Administrative Court requires proper legislation in a law that regulates the procedural law of the Administrative Court

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

KRTHA BHAYANGKARA | Volume 16 Number 1, June 2022

Examining The Shift in The Procedural Law of The Administrative Court: Discourse on Changes….

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Book

Azhari, Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy; Aidul Fitriciada. “Pergeseran Paradigma Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia Dan Belanda.” Arena Hukum 12, no. 3 (2019): 576–591.

Berman, Harold J. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. London: Harvard University Press, 1983.

Budiono, Abdul Rachmad. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2005.

Campbell, Enid. Legal Research. Fourth. Sydney: The Law Book Company, 1996.

Cotterell, Roger. The Sociology of Law an Introduction. London: Butterworths, 1984.

CST Kansil. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2018.

Dani, Umar. “Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Akses Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Efektif.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2019.

Habibi, Dani. “Perbandingan Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Verwaltungsgerecht Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Rakyat.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 1 (2019): 1–22.

Hadjon, Phillipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Di Indonesia, 1994.

Haryati, Indah Tri. “Kewenangan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mengadili Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2015.

Iskandar, Elidar Sari; Hadi. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Edited by Malahayati. Lhokseumawe: CV BeNa Edukasi, 2014.

Isra, Saldi. “Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.” Universitas Gajah Mada, 2010.

Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto; Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT.RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007.

Manan, Bagir. “Peranan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Ujung Pandang, 1995.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2014.

Prasetyo, Tony. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang.” Jurnal Spektrum Hukum 14, no. 2 (2017): 181–198.

R Abdul Djamali. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996.

Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Sackville, Justice Ronald. “Courts and Social Change.” Federal Law Review 33, no. 3 (2005): 373–390.

KRTHA BHAYANGKARA | Volume 16 Number 1, June 2022

M. Ikbar Andi Endang, Moh. Fadli, Istislam, Dewi Cahyandari 49

Sidharta, Bernard Arief. Ilmu Hukum Indonesia: Upaya Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Sistematik Yang Responsif Terhadap Perubahan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Transformasi & Refleksi). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

———. “Restatement Tentang Yurisdiksi Peradilan Mengadili Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pemerintah.” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum 1, no. 48 (2019): 42–43.

Sudarsono. Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Acara Di PeradilanTata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Sunarto. Peradilan Perlu Mencari Solusi Terbaik Terhadap 3 Fenomena Ini. Pembinaan Pimpinan Mahkamah Agung R.I Bagi Pimpinan Pengadilan Tingkat Banding Se-Indonesia. 10, 2019.

Supandi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: PT. Alumni, 2016.

Wahyunadi, Yodi Martono. “Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Universitas Trisakti, 2016.

Yanti, Herma. “Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Pemilu.” Legalitas VI, no. 1 (2014): 75–93.

Zairin Harahap. Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Journal

Azhari, Rifqi Ridlo Pahlevy; Eid al-Fitriada. "Paradigm Shift in State Administrative Courts in Indonesia and the Netherlands." Law Arena 12, no. 3 (2019): 576–591.

Habibi, Dani. "Comparison of the Law of the State Administrative Court and Verwaltungsgerecht as the Protection of the People's Law." Kanun Journal of Legal Studies 21, no. 1 (2019): 1–22.

Prasetyo, Tony. “Public Information Disclosure Dispute Resolution at the Semarang State Administrative Court.” Journal of Legal Spectrum 14, no. 2 (2017): 181–198.

Sackville, Justice Ronald. "Courts and Social Change." Federal Law Review 33, no. 3 (2005): 373–390.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Restatement on Judicial Jurisdiction to Trial Unlawful Acts of the Government.” Journal of Legal Problems 1, no. 48 (2019): 42–43.

Yanti, Herma. "Election State Administrative Dispute." Legality VI, no. 1 (2014): 75–93.

Laws and legislations.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Undang-Undang No. 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.

KRTHA BHAYANGKARA