Konsep Pengembangan Clinical Legal Education Berbasis Pendekatan Yang Berkeadilan

Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna

doi:10.31599/krtha.v17i2.809

Authors

Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i2.809

Abstract

Currently, the implementation of legal education in Indonesia has completed by including Clinical Legal Education (CLE). Legal higher education is expected to prepare law graduates who do not only serve as guardians of laws or the rule of law or, more extreme, known as (la bouche de la loi). Consequently, such law enforcement will only be subject to established procedures. Thus, a CLE development concept is needed that prepares lawyers who are committed to substantial justice. To development concept of developing CLE based on an equitable legal approach. The conclusion that can be conveyed is that the ideal CLE to apply is to use a doctrinal approach that puts forward a juridical-philosophical approach. This approach uses an analysis of the basic tenets of a norm to realize the settlement of legal cases based on the values of justice. In addition to the doctrinal approach, introduce a non-doctrinal approach that is based on the constructivism paradigm. Law in this approach is conceptualized contextually, relatively or plurally based on social, individual, local and specific experience. With this approach, it is hoped that later the values of justice will be realized as the main goal, in solving legal problems faced by them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atip Latipulhayat. “John Austin.” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2016): 436–447.

Bruggink, JJ.H. Refleksi Tentang Hukum Pengertian-Pengertian Dasar Dalam Teori Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Erlyn Indarti. “Bridging The Gaps : A Paradigmatic Insight Into Philosofy Of Law.” Diponegoro Law Review Vol.1, no. No.1 (2016): 1–16. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/12203/0.

———. “Legal Constructivism : Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Hukum Dalam Rangka Membangun Masyarakat Madani.” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol. XXX, no. No. 3 (2001): 139–154.

H.Muhammad Bahar Akkase Teng. “Rasionalis Dan Rasionalisme Dalam Perspektif Sejarah.” Jurnal Ilmu Budaya 4, no. 2 (2016): 14–27.

H.R. Otje Salman dan Anthon F. Susanto. Teori Hukum (Mengingat, Mengumpulkan Dan Membuka Kembali). Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010.

Herget, James E. Contemporary German Legal Philosophy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996.

Kaila Morin. “Bridging The Conceptual Gap Between Law and Morality : A Critical Response To H.L.A. Hart’s The Concept of Law.” UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Vol. 1, no. No. 1 (2012): 120–136. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1470665/1/1UCLJLJ120 - Bridging the Gap.pdf.

Matthew H. Kramer. Where Law and Morality Meet. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

Pratama Herry Herlambang. “Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum.” Indonesian State Law Review 2, no. 1 (2019): 103–110.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

Rasjidi, Lili. Dasar-Dasar Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1990.

Ronald Dworkin. Law’s Empire. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.

Samekto, Adji. Pergeseran Pemikiran Hukum Dari Era Yunani Menuju Postmodernisme. Edited by Rita Triana Budiarti. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2015.

Samekto, F X. Adji. “Effect of Positivism in Clinical Legal Education.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal Vol. 12, no. No. 1 (2017): 203–207. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/12572/7220.

Samekto, F X Adji. “Menggugat Relasi Filsafat Positivisme Dengan Ajaran Hukum Doktrinal.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 12, no. No. 1 (2012): 74–84.

———. “Relasi Hukum Dengan Kekuasaan : Melihat Hukum Dalam Perspektif Realitas.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol. 13, no. No. 1 (2013): 89–98.

Shidarta. Hukum Penalaran Dan Penalaran Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.

Simanjuntak, Herry Anto. “Peranan Lembaga Pelayanan Bantuan Hukum Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Membantu Masyarakat TidakMampu.” Al-Ahkam Vol. 16, no. No. 2 (2020): 92–99. https://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/ahkm/article/view/3684/2901.

Sudantra, I Ketut. “Implikasi Keputusan Menteri ATR / Kepala BPN Nomor 276 / KEP-19 . 2 / X / 2017 Terhadap Kedudukan Tanah Milik Desa Pakraman.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana Vol. 7, no. No. 4 (2018): 546–564.

Susilo, Ispurwandoko. “Kedudukan Laboratorium Klinik Dan Bantuan Hukum Dalam Mengemban Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kasus Pada Fakultas Hukum Uncen).” Papua Law Journal Vol. 1, no. No. 2 (2017): 237–252. https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/PLJ/article/view/590/525.

Suteki. Hukum Progresif: Hukum Berdimensi Transendental Dalam Konteks KeIndonesiaan. Surakarta, 2018.

Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum, Konsep Dan Metode. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.

Yusriyadi. Industrialisasi Dan Perubahan Fungsi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Denpasar Nomor 4/PDT/2016/PT.DPS. (n.d.).