Implementasi Putusan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Yang Dilakukan Anak Dibawah Umur: Studi Perkara Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN.Tjk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v8i2.1292Keywords:
Crime, Fraud, ChildrenAbstract
The problem of crime acts never seems to disappear and is never completely resolved. This also has an impact on the increasing number of criminals among minors. At present, it is suspected that the number of underage children involved in criminal acts is increasing. This is related to the pattern of daily life of children and social pressures. The objectives to be achieved in this research are to find out, understand, and analyze the efforts of the child protection commission in providing legal protection for minors who commit criminal acts and to analyze the basis for judges' considerations in deciding cases of criminal acts of fraud committed by minors. The use of this research is also expected to add theoretical, practical, and analytical references as a way out in criminal law. The research method used is empirical juridical research. Legal protection for children can be interpreted as an effort to protect the law against various freedoms and children's human rights and various interests related to children's welfare. Child protection can be done directly or indirectly. Directly, meaning that the activities are directly aimed at children who are the target of direct treatment. Activities like this can be in the form of protecting children from various threats from outside and within themselves. The judge's decision is very decisive in a case at trial, because in the judge's decision it determines the fate of a person being detained or not, of course in making a decision the judge must really consider everything that is presented before the court, because not only the fate of the accused is determined by the judge's decision but also the fate of a defendant's family. The Bapas and Kpai are also very decisive in the decision because the advice from the Bapas and the Kpai is also one of the basic considerations for the judge in making a decision, the Bapas and the Kpai must also accompany the child from arrest to the decision in accordance with the governing law.
Downloads
References
Buku
Barda Nawawi Arief. 2002. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
P.A.F Lamintang dan C. Djisman Samosir. 1981. .Delik-delik Khusus Yang Ditujukan Terhadap Hak Milik dan Lain-lain Hak Yang Timbul Dari Hak Milik. Tarsito, Bandung.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 2003. Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia. Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Wiryono Prodjodikoro. 2002. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. PT. Eresco, Jakarta.
Zainal Abidin, Farid. 2010. Hukum Pidana 1. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
JURNAL
Erlina. 2021. Analisis Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Faktur Penjualan Atas Nama Perusahaan Distributor Lampu Bohlam Berbagai Merek (Studi Putusan Nomor: 366/Pid.B/ 2020/Pn.Tjk).Universitas bandar Lampung ,Vol.4, No.1.
Noeke Sri Wardhani. 2009. Sudirman Sitepu dan joko susetyanto, Penerapan Pidana Alternatif Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana di Pengadilan Negeri Bengkulu, Jurnal Kriminologin, Pengadila Negri Bengkulu, Vol. V No. II.
Rio sutrisno.2014.Penipuan Melalui Bisnis Online dalam Kajian Hukum Republi Indonesia. jurnal penipuan bisnis online, fakultas hukum, universitas indonesia, Vol.I No.02.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.