Dampak COVID19 Pada Kesiapan Teknologi dan Penerimaan Teknologi di Kampus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v1i1.276Keywords:
Covid19, e-learning, technology readiness, technology acceptanceAbstract
Covid-19 is currently in Indonesia for more than 5 months. To prevent this disease becoming widespread, various strategies have been carried out, among others, by doing Lock Down and large-scale social restrictions. Community activities are affected. By relying on communication technology and IT including the Internet, people can still do activities even with limitations. Likewise, Higher Education got limited activities. For this reason, all teaching and learning activities used an online system known as e-learning. This paper conveys various activities on campus and its constraints during the covid-19. In general, the constraints aside from technological facilities are also obstacles from the academic community in matters relating to technology readiness and technology acceptance, which are delivered descriptively.
Keywords: Covid19, e-learning, technology readiness, technology acceptance
Abstrak
Covid-19 tengah melanda Indonesia saat Ini sudah 5 bulan lebih. Untuk mencegah wabah ini menjadi luas maka dilakukan berbagai strategi antara lain dengan melakukan Lock Down dan pembatasan social skala besar. Kegiatan masyarakat menjadi terpengaruh. Dengan mengandalkan teknologi komunikasi dan IT diantaranya Internet, masyarakat masih dapat melakukan Kegiatan walaupun dengan keterbatasan. Demikian juga dengan Perguruan tinggi, mengalami keterbatasan kegiatan. Untuk itu segala Kegiatan belajar mengajar menggunakan system daring yang dikenal dengan e-learning. Makalah ini menyampaikan macam-macam kegiatan di kampus dan kendalanya dalam masa covid-19. Secara umum kendalanya selain fasilitas teknologi juga kendala dari civitas akademika dalam hal yang terkait dengan kesiapan teknologi dan penerimaan teknologi, yang disampaikan secara diskriptif.
Kata kunci: Covid19, e-learning, kesiapan teknologi, penerimaan teknologi
Downloads
References
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading,.
Guhr, N., Loi, T., Wiegard, R., & Breitner, M. H. (2013). Technology Readiness in Customers ’ Perception and Acceptance of M ( obile ) -Payment : An Empirical Study in Finland , Germany , the USA and Japan, (March), 119–133.
Ismail, I., Bokhare, S. F., Azizan, S. N., & Azman, N. (2013). Teaching via mobile phone: A case study on Malaysian teachers’ technology acceptance and readiness. Journal of Educators Online, 10(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2013.1.3
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Kuo, K. M., Liu, C. F., & Ma, C. C. (2013). An investigation of the effect of nurses’ technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-88
Kvale, M., & Husa, A. (2009). The TRAM Framework in a Social Media Context - Measuring Attitudes Towards Consumer-Company Interaction. BI Master Thesis, 1–77.
Lin, C.-H., Shih, H.-Y., Sher, P. J. . W. Y.-L. (2005). Consumer adoption of e-service: Integrating technology readiness with the technology acceptance model. In Proceedings of PICMET ’05: Technology Management: A Unifying Discipline for Melting the Boundaries (pp. 483–488). Portland, Oregon, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2005.1509728
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. In . Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 114. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772658
Mimin Nur Aisyah, Mahendra Adhi Nugroho, E. M. S. (2013). Pengaruh Technology Readiness Terhadap Penerimaan Teknologi komputer Pada UMKM di Yogyakarta.
Murat Esen, N. E. (2014). Effects of Technology Readiness On Technology Acceptance In E-HRM: Mediating Role of Perceived Usefulness. Retrieved from http://www.beykon.org/dergi/ 2014/SPRING/M.Esen.pdf
Panday, R. (2015a). Analysis of technology readiness and technology acceptance of geodesy student in using ina geoportal, (November), 10–12.
Panday, R. (2015b). Evaluation of Technology Readiness-Acceptance in Operation of Project Management Services. Banda Aceh, Indonesia: Presenting and publishing in proceeding, at 1st Joint Conference Indonesia Malaysia, Bangladesh and Ireand at Ubudiyah Indonesia University.
Panday, R. (2015c). The Effect of Technology Readiness on Technology Acceptance in Using Services Delivery of Academic Information System (pp. 978–979).
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: How and why your customers adopt technology. New York: Free Press.
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees ’ technology readiness on technology acceptance §, 44, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.005
Yen, J., & Chen, S. (2010). Perspectives from the TRAM Model on Adopting e-Learning: An Analysis of the Chain and Franchise Industry in Taiwan. 北商學報 第.
Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
_-_Copy1.jpg)
