4D Research and Development Model: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/na7deq07Keywords:
development model, Systematic Literature Review, 4D (define, design, develop, diseeminate)Abstract
The 4D model—Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate—is a widely recognized framework for research and development (R&D), particularly in educational innovation. This systematic literature review (SLR) examines the implementation trends, challenges, and opportunities of the 4D model across various fields, analyzing 50 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2013 and 2023 using PRISMA guidelines. Results indicate that the 4D model is predominantly applied in educational contexts, such as curriculum design and instructional material development, with limited adoption in non-educational sectors. Major challenges include a lack of empirical validation and difficulties in adapting the model to multidisciplinary applications. Opportunities for enhancing the 4D model include integration with contemporary methodologies, such as agile approaches and artificial intelligence. This study provides recommendations for future research and practical insights to broaden the applicability and impact of the 4D model.
Downloads
References
Afdila, H., & Hayati, R. (2024). Pengembangan Materi Layanan Informasi Tentang Merokok. Journal on Education, 6(3), 15585-15598.
Amali, K., Kurniawati, Y., & Zulhiddah, Z. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Sains Teknologi Masyarakat pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Natural Science Integration, 2(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v2i2.8151.
Baydoun, E., Mesmar, J., Beydoun, A. R., & Hillman, J. R. (2022). An overview of research and development in academia. Higher Education in the Arab World: Research and Development, 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80122-9_2.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dewi, R. K., Wati, D. D. E., Lasmana, O., Yerimadesi, Festiyed, Ahda, Y., & Alberida, H. (2024). Development Research in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Trends in Development Models and Instruments Used. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6876.
Do, H. N., Do, B. N., & Nguyen, M. H. (2023). 3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Jeyaraj, A., Hughes, L., Davies, G. H., Ahuja, M., Albashrawi, M. A., ... & Walton, P. (2024). “Real impact”: Challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice–Making a difference in industry, policy, and society. International Journal of Information Management, 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750.
Filatro, A., & Cavalcanti, C. C. (2024). Technology-Enabled Learning and Design Methodologies: Lessons from Creative, Agile, Immersive, and Analytical Advancements. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003562290.
Hariyanto, B., Ita, M. Z., Wiwik, S. U., & Rindawati, R. (2022). 4D Model Learning Device Development Method of the Physical Geography Field Work Guidance Book. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 372, p. 05008). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237205008.
Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2021). The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12547.
Martínez-Noya, A., & García-Canal, E. (2021). Innovation performance feedback and technological alliance portfolio diversity: The moderating role of firms’ R&D intensity. Research Policy, 50(9), 104321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104321.
Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Model-model penelitian pengembangan (research and development). Jurnal pengembangan profesi pendidik indonesia (JPPPI).
Purnomo, R. & Fudholi, A. (2020). Implementasi FingerPrint dan Short Message Service Gateway pada Sistem Presensi. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 20(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.31599/jki.v20i1.73.
Purnomo, S., Rabiman, R., Priyanto, S., & Mustofa, I. A. (2023, November). Development of Audio And Video System Learning Modules for Light Vehicle Engineering Vocational School: 4D Model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology, Education, and Science (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 39-49).
Rahmat, M., Aziz, S., & Nordin, H. (2020). Application of the 4D Model in Healthcare Training: A Case Study. Journal of Healthcare Education Research, 15(3), 45-60.
Smith, J., & Taylor, K. (2022). Enhancing R&D Methodologies: Integrating Agile Principles into the 4D Model. International Journal of Research Methodology, 18(4), 89-104.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Indiana: Indiana University.
Wang, Q., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Qu, H. (2021). A survey on ML4VIS: Applying machine learning advances to data visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 28(12), 5134-5153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3106142.
Waruwu, M. (2024). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D): Konsep, Jenis, Tahapan dan Kelebihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(2), 1220-1230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2141.
Yunitamara, B., Mulyanti, S., & Sari, W. K. (2023). Development Of Electronic Module Based On Green Chemistry On Reaction Rate Material. Jurnal Education and Development, 11(2), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i2.4436.
Zajda, J., & Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. Globalisation and education reforms: Creating effective learning environments, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3.
_-_Copy1.jpg)
