Pengaruh Kesiapan Kecerdasan Artifisial Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Berkelanjutan Melalui Kompetensi Digital, Kelincahan Karyawan, Dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/vg11g462Keywords:
Agility, AI readiness, Digital competence, Innovative behaviorAbstract
This study investigated how artificial intelligence readiness influenced sustainable employee performance during technological transformations. Grounded in the Dynamic Capability Theory and the Ability Motivation Opportunity Theory, this research examined the mediating roles of digital competence, employee agility, and innovative work behavior. A quantitative survey involved eighty educational staff members at Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling. The findings revealed that artificial intelligence readiness significantly fostered employee agility and innovative work behavior, which in turn significantly mediated the relationship to sustainable employee performance. Interestingly, digital competence did not significantly impact sustainable performance directly, suggesting technical skills alone were insufficient without cognitive flexibility and creative motivation. The study concluded that organizations must invest heavily in cultivating agile and innovative work environments to maximize the benefits of artificial intelligence.
Downloads
References
Alavi, S. (2022). The impact of employee agility on performance.
Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
Bos-Nehles, A., & Veenendaal, A. (2019). Employee innovative work behaviour.
Boughzala, I., & al., et. (2023). Digital competence and AI transformation.
Cai, Z., & al., et. (2023). Employee agility in digital organizations.
Chui, M., Roberts, R., & Yee, L. (2023). Generative AI and the future of work in America. McKinsey Global Institute, 1–28.
Enny Istanti. (2025). Dampak Penerapan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) terhadap Praktik MSDM. EKONOMIKA45: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan Volume 12 Nomor 2, 726–742.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3 (ed.)). Sage.
Istanti, E., Mujanah, S., & Sumiati, S. (2025). From human resources to sustainable outcomes: A moderated mediation analysis of creative Engagement and digital transformation in hospitals. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(12), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.55214/2576-8484.v9i12.11308
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour.
Ji, H., & Yan, Y. (2021). The impact of high-involvement work processes on sustainable employee performance: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 13(24), 13915.
Kaur, S., & Kang, L. S. (2023). Innovative work behavior in the era of artificial intelligence: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100378.
Lin, H., Chen, M., & Wu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence readiness in the workplace: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(11), 2210–2235.
Margherita, A., & Heikkilä, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in human resource management.
Muduli, A. (2021). Employee agility: A comprehensive review of literature and future research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 31(2), 100780.
Mulia, D., & Susanto, A. (2022). Sustainable employee performance: The role of transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Management Development, 41(4), 211–225.
Oberländer, M., Beinicke, A., & Bipp, T. (2021). Digital competencies: A review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education, 146, 103752.
Pratama, R., & Lestari, S. (2023). The mediating role of digital competence in the relationship between AI adoption and employee performance. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 13(1), 45–56.
Pumptow, M., & Brahm, T. (2021). Students’ Digital Media Self-Efficacy and Its Importance for Higher Education Institutions: Development and Validation of a Survey Instrument. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09463-5
Rahman, A., Siregar, B., & Setiawan, R. (2025). The AMO framework in the digital age: How opportunity shapes ability and motivation for continuous innovation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 36(1), 88–105.
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management.
Riaz, S., & al., et. (2023). Innovative work behavior and organizational performance.
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007a). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.01.007
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., & Layer, J. K. (2007b). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(5), 445–460.
Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Digital learning: Developing skills for digital transformation of organizations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, 327–334.
Teece, D. J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and the new paradigm of organizational adaptation. Strategic Management Journal, 42(7), 1323–1345.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Knowledge and Strategy, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035334995.00014
Upadhyay, P., & al., et. (2023). Artificial intelligence readiness and workforce capability.
van Laar, E., & al., et. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century digital skills.
Wang, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). Employee agility and innovative behavior as microfoundations of dynamic capabilities in the AI era. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122976.
Zhang, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). Zhang, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). Strategic talent management in the digital age. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(5), 989-1012. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(5), 989–1012.
_-_Copy1.jpg)
