Fulfillment of Simple Proof Requirements on Bankruptcy Application Based on Sema Number 03 of 2023

Unggul Wibawa Widhayaka; Sonyendah Retnaningsih; Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi  Ramadhan

doi:10.31599/krtha.v19i1.3784

Authors

Unggul Wibawa Widhayaka Universitas Pancasila
Sonyendah Retnaningsih Universitas Indonesia
Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan University of Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v19i1.3784

Keywords:

Supreme Court, Circular Letter, Simple Proof, Apartment Developer, Integration

Abstract

The Supreme Court has issued Circular Letter Number (SEMA) 3 of 2023 which stipulates that simple proof cannot be applied in bankruptcy against apartment and/or flat developers. The circular is predicted to protect consumer interests and eliminate legal remedies in the form of bankruptcy applications to the commercial court, so that they must be submitted as lawsuits to the district court. The circular is not in accordance with the principle of integration in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (KPKPU Law). The KPKPU Law has clearly defined the matter of simple proof, and does not provide special protection for apartment and/or flat developers. Normative research is carried out with doctrinal research and tests the level of synchronization of regulations. The research is evaluative, examining cases that have occurred, based on comparative law. From this study it is concluded that proof is categorized as simple if there is a debt that is due and unpaid and there are two or more creditors. The requirement for simple proof does not consider the complexity of its impact on consumers. SEMA is a policy regulation, so if it conflicts with the regulations above it, the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori will apply. SEMA 03 of 2023 cannot change the provisions of the law, so simple proof can still be implemented against apartment developers. SEMA 03 of 2023 is not in line with the KPKPU Law so that by law it should be cancelled.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Articles

Andani, Devi and Wiwin Budi Pratiwi. “Prinsip Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Hukum Iur Quia Iustum 8, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art9.

Apriandini, Dian and Amad Sudiro. “Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Lunas yang Belum Mendapatkan Pemecahan Sertifikat dari Developer yang Dipailitkan.” Binamulia Hukum 2, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i1.435.

Gunawan, Chika and Albert Tanjung. “Penerapan Prinsip Exceptio Non Adimpleti Contractus Dalam Hukum Perikatan: Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 1796/K/Pdt/2015.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.62017/merdeka.v1i6.2028.

Iswara, I.Gusti Ngurah Bagus Maha, Simon Nahak, and Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati. “Kepastian Hukum Pengenaan Pajak Penghasilan Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah dan/atau Bangunan.” Jurnal Hukum Prasada 6, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.6.1.2019.42-51.

Kesuma, Angga Yonar, and Siti Mahmudah. “Violation of the Principle of Lex Superior Derogate Legi Inferiori in the Formation of Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2023.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 11, no. 5 (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i5.5770.

Kurniawan, Malik Wahyu. “Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Jatuh Pailit Terhadap Notaris.” Jurnal Rechtens 10, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v10i2.1034.

Putra, Hendra Catur. “Kedudukan SEMA Dalam Sistem Hierarki Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.” Elqonun: Jurnal Hukum Ketatanegaraan 1, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.19109/hajpk454.

Rongkonusa, Rulman Ignatius, Yuhelson, and Cicilia Julyani Tondy. “Diskresi Penentuan Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Persidangan Permohonan Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU).” Seikat Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v2i2.466.

Santoso, Raihan Andhika, Elan Jaelani, and Utang Rosidin. “Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia.” Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i4.1392.

Saputri, Elsa Mellinda, Waspiah and Ridwan Arifin. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Hal Pengembang (Developer) Apartemen Dinyatakan Pailit.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 2, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.1936.

Situmorang, Fernando, Ramlanilina Sinaulan, and Mohamad Ismed. “Kajian Hukum Tentang Kedudukan SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Atas Undang-Undang Kepailitan Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.” Jurnal Studi Interdisipliner Perspektif 22, no. 2 (2023). https://ejournal-jayabaya.id/Perspektif/article/view/100.

Slamet, Sri Redjeki and Fitria Olivia. “Permohonan Kepailitan Atas Developer Apartemen Tidak Memenuhi Persyaratan Fakta Yang Terbukti Secara Sederhana Suatu Kajian Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum.” Lex Jurnalica 21, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v21i1.7667.

Tan, Kendry and Hari Sutra Disemadi. “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Hukum Yang Responsif Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara Indonesia.” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis (Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Semarang, 2022). https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i1.8803

Book

Irwansyah. “Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel.” Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media (2022).

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini. Sejarah, Asas dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Undang-undang No 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group, (2016).

Websites

Hukumonline.com. "Sebut Pengembang Tak Bisa Dipailit PKPU, SEMA 3/2023 Dinilai Tak Sejalan UU Kepailitan." Accessed December 2, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/sebut-pengembang-tak-bisa-dipailit-pkpu--sema-3-2023-dinilai-tak-sejalan-uu-kepailitan-lt65eee651b9ad2/.

Kurniadi, Dedy. "Pembuktian Sederhana dalam Permohonan PKPU terhadap Pengembang." Accessed December 2, 2024. https://dedykurniadi.com/pembuktian-sederhana-dalam-permohonan-pkpu-terhadap-pengembang.html.

Mahardika, Daffa Fahrizkry. "Tinjauan SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2023: Pembuktian Sederhana terhadap Permohonan Kepailitan PKPU Perusahaan Pengembang Apartemen Rumah Susun." Accessed December 2, 2024. https://lekslawyer.com/tinjauan-sema-no-3-tahun-2023-pembuktian-sederhana-terhadap-permohonan-kepailitan-pkpu-perusahaan-pengembang-apartemen-rumah-susun/.