Penyimpangan Dalam Praktik Covernote Notaris Pada Transaksi Kredit Bank: Analisis Tanggung Jawab Dan Implikasi Hukumnya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/jaq4ka27Kata Kunci:
Banking, Covernote, Credit disbursement, Legal protection, NotaryAbstrak
Through credit disbursement based on prudential principles, banking plays a vital role in the national economy. Often, the credit drawdown process requires administrative support from a notary, who issues a covernote as a temporary statement while collateral documents are being processed. However, the lack of clear regulations regarding the legal status of covernotes leads to legal uncertainty, irregularities, and risks for banks. The objective of this research is to examine the notary's liability in issuing covernotes as a basis for credit disbursement and as a form of legal protection for banking creditors. This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that while a covernote is not an original deed, its issuance remains the professional responsibility of the notary. Conversely, legal protection for banks can only be achieved through the application of prudential principles, the completeness of credit agreements, and recourse (regress) against the notary if a violation is proven. This research suggests the need for clear regulations regarding the utilization of covernotes in the banking industry.
Unduhan
Referensi
Adjie, H. (2013). Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H. (2014). Tafsir Tematik Hukum Notaris di Indonesia : Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Anshori, Abdul Ghofur., (2009), Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Damayanti, V., Zuhir, M. A., & Mansyur. A. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Membuat Covernote Sebagai Jaminan Hutang Atas Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah. Repertorium Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i1.570
Juliyanto, D. W., & Imanullah, M. N. (2018). Problematika Covernote Notaris Sebagai Pegangan Bank Untuk Media Realisasi Pembiayaan/Kredit Dalam Dunia Perbankan. Jurnal Repertorium, 5(2), 51-64.
Kadir, R., Patittingi, F., Said, N., & Arisaputra. M. I. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Pada Penerbitan Covernote. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 31(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.35274
Kie, Tan Thong, (2000), Studi Notariat &Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, Jakarta.
Purnamasari, I. D. (2016). Kompilasi Hukum Perbankan dan Transaksi E-Commerce. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Pradnyasari, G. U. P. W., & Utama, I. M. A. (2018). Kedudukan Hukum Covernote Notaris Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bank dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Acta Comitas Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(3), 446-457. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i03.p05
Rachmayani, D., & Suwandono, A. (2017). Covernote Notaris Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dalam Perspektif Hukum Jaminan. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 1(1), 73-86.
Rohmah, N. S., Tondy. C. J., & Halim. A.N. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Atas Surat Keterangan Notaris/Covernote Terhadap Proses Pencairan Kredit. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(9), 3767-3779. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i9.1531
Royani, L., Hadi, H., & Asrori, M. H. (2015). Problematika Yuridis Pelaksanaan Prinsip Kehati-hatian Perbankan terhadap Covernote sebagai Syarat Pencairan Pembiayaan. Jurnal Repertorium, (3), 187-199.
Trisna, I. S., Faniyah, I., Arliman, L. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris Atas Penerbitan Covernote. Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review, 3(3), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.31933/7s125m44
Usman, R. (2018). Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Sinar Grafika.
Yusuf, D. M. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana terhadap Notaris yang Menerbitkan Covernote Fiktif. Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 5(1), 55–60.
Yusmi, S. A. (2020). Akibat Hukum Pencairan Kredit Yang Didasarkan Pada Covernote Notaris. Recital Review, 2(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v2i2.9043
_-_Copy1.jpg)
