Comparison of The Katarungang Pambarangay System in The Philippines With The Concept of Restorative Justice in Indonesia in Community-Based Dispute Resolution

Authors

  • Lusia Sulastri Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Bambang Karsono Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Carmelita B. Chavez University of Mindanao
  • Mechelle C. Gempesao University of Mindanao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v20i2.5481

Keywords:

Katarungang Pambarangay, Restorative Justice, dispute resolution, comparative law, effectiveness

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparison of dispute resolution mechanisms in the Katarungang Pambarangay system in the Philippines with the concept of restorative justice in Indonesia, as well as assess the effectiveness of both in resolving community disputes. This study uses normative legal methods with statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the Katarungang Pambarangay system regulated in Republic Act No. 7160 (Local Government Code of 1991) is a community-based mechanism that is mandatory and structured through the stages of mediation, conciliation, and arbitration by the Tagapamayapa Board. Meanwhile, restorative justice in Indonesia is an integrated approach in the formal criminal justice system based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Code, which is implemented through the authority to terminate investigations and prosecutions. In terms of effectiveness, both systems show positive results in dispute resolution. Katarungang Pambarangay has proven to be effective in increasing community participation and reducing the burden on the courts, while restorative justice in Indonesia has shown a significant increase in the number of case settlements, victim satisfaction, and the potential to suppress recidivism. The main difference lies in the nature of obligations and implementing actors, where the Philippines emphasizes the role of the community, while Indonesia relies on law enforcement officials. The study concludes that both systems have their advantages and that the integration between community-based approaches and state institutional support can be an ideal model for more effective and equitable dispute resolution.

References

Anavesa, J. M. (2024). Village justice system implementation and performance among selected villages in Southern Leyte Province, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049X.2024.4.3.2795

Asis, J. M., Baja, A. J. E., Eduardo, G. L., Wenceslao, P. D., & Aya-ay, A. M. (2022). The relationship of quality decision-making and effectiveness of conciliation process of a barangay-based justice system. Journal of Legal Subjects, 3(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.31.1.5

Awaliyah Nasution, N. P., et al. (2022). The concept of restorative justice in handling crimes in the criminal justice system. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 1(5), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2022.1.5.37

Aziz, A., Maksum, G., & Mutakin, A. (2023). Restorative justice approach in the settlement of domestic violence crimes. Alashriyyah, 9(2), 99–112.

Bawono, B. T., & Glaser, H. (2023). The urgency of restorative justice regulation on hate speech. Bestuur, 11(2), 364–383.

Cahaya Wulandari. (2020). The dynamics of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Indonesia. Journal of Jurisprudence. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v10i2.12233

Ernest John B. Metillo, et al. (2022). The tales of barangay officials in resolving community disputes. Middle East Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 5(2), 190–200.

Fakhriah, E. L., & Afriana, A. (2023). Cross border of jurisdiction between arbitration and district court in business dispute settlement under the Indonesian legal system. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Gemilang, M. F. (2019). Restorative justice as a progressive law by National Police investigators. Journal of Police Science, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v13i3.194

Hasan, H. (2013). The application of restorative justice in the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.247-262

Hasibuan, S. A., Tarigan, C. A. P., Meliala, N. M. S., & H. R. A. C. (2024). Restorative justice as a progressive legal form in Indonesian laws and regulations. Indonesian Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 1(36), 45–55.

Husaini, M. (2024). The role of the prosecutor's office of the Republic of Indonesia in optimizing restorative justice policy in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences.

Irabiah, I., et al. (2022). The application of restorative justice at the prosecution level (case study at the Kotamobagu District Attorney's Office). Journal of Perspective, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v27i2.828

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Legal research methods. Kencana.

Meliala, N. C. (2015). Restorative justice approach: Efforts involve the direct participation of victims and perpetrators in the settlement of criminal cases. Veritas et Justitia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v1i1.1419

Mohammad, A.-G. D. (2024). Effectiveness of barangay justice system in Zamboanga City: An assessment. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (IJMRAP), 7(1), 195–198.

Nagara, A. S., Adi, E. A., & Maulana, R. (2025). The impact of the implementation of the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice for victims and perpetrators. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization.

Noveloso, J. P. N., Nebrida, A. P., Badua, R. B., Calica, C. C. R. M., Diza, P. B. A. D., Ragonton, V. N., & Chatoy, T. A. (2024). Harmonizing community justice: Evaluating the effectiveness of Katarungang Pambarangay in Bacnotan, La Union. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 4(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12730292

Satriadi. (2022). Restorative justice: The limitations of authority of police and prosecutors in the criminal justice system. Al-Bayyinah, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v6i1.2594

Seko, S., & Soa, A. H. (2025). Revitalizing tradition: The role of pakat perkara in resolving land disputes within the Dayak Tobag community. Legal Issues, 54(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.47-56

Siswajanthy, F., Rohaedi, E., & Abid, H. (2019). Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution in religious court systems in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1121

Triana, I. D. S., & E. M. (2022). Restorative justice as a solution to overcome prison overcapacity in Indonesia. Journal of Locus Delicti, 3(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v3i2.1613

Utami, N. S., Katharina, R., & Asrori. (2024). Conflict resolution in the customary village governance administration of Baduy, Tengger, and Samin ethnic groups in Indonesia. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(8), 6371. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6371

Verdad, J. (2024). Mediating disputes in the barangays: The work world of lupon chiefs. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(5), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.5.11

Wibowo, S. A., & Wijaya, M. R. (2021). Implementation of the small claims court in dispute case settlement in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v5i1.42859

Downloads

Published

05-08-2026

How to Cite

Comparison of The Katarungang Pambarangay System in The Philippines With The Concept of Restorative Justice in Indonesia in Community-Based Dispute Resolution. (2026). KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 20(2), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v20i2.5481