Penyelesaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Penetapan Praperadilan: Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan

Authors

  • Rahman Amin Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Iren Manalu Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Winda Apricilya Van Hemert Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Muh Fikri Al Aziz Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v8i1.1250

Keywords:

compensation, criminal cases, pretrial

Abstract

The Indonesian state of law means that everything in the administration of government, including the law enforcement process, is carried out in accordance with applicable legal provisions and for acts of arrest, detention, prosecution and trial of a person who is not based on law, wrongfully against a person, or in the application of the law, that person is entitled to obtain compensation to provide justice. This research is a normative juridical law research, with a statutory approach, where legal material is obtained through literature study. The results of the study indicate that the settlement of compensation based on a pretrial determination cannot be carried out by the Ministry of Finance because there is no Minister of Finance Regulation as a provision for the implementation of compensation payments. The inhibiting factors for the settlement of compensation are the legal substance factor, namely the Decree of the Minister of Finance regarding compensation that is not relevant to the current situation but has not been changed, the factor of differences in perception about the party responsible for the settlement of compensation, and the unavailability of a budget specifically allocated for the settlement of compensation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku

A. Mukthie Fadjar, Tipe Negara Hukum, Malang : Bayu Media, Malang, 2005.

Burhan Ashshofa, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : PT.Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2005.

Jonaedi Efendi dan Johny Ibrahim, Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Jakarta : Kencana, 2016.

Haeranah, Ganti Kerugian Bagi Tersangka, Terdakwa dan Terpidana Dalam Perpektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Tanggung Jawab Negara, Makassar : Pustaka Pena Press, 2016.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta : Kencana, 2013.

Rahman Amin, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata, Sleman : Deepublish, 2020.

Yopi Gunawan dan Kristian, Perkembangan Konsep Negara Hukum & Negara Hukum Pancasila, Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2015.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.

UU No 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

UU No 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

UU No 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.

JURNAL HUKUM SASANA | Volume 8 Number 1, June 2022

Rahman Amin, Iren Manalu, Winda Apricilya Van Hemert, Muh Fikri Al Aziz 31

UU No 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia.

UU No 8 Tahun 1981 tentang KUHAP.

PP No 92 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 tentang Pelaksanaan KUHAP.

Sumber Lain

https://www.bantuanhukum.or.id/web/857-hari-berlalu-pengamen-korban-salah-tangkap-baru-menerima-ganti-rugi/

https://bantuanhukum.or.id/pengamen-korban-salah-tangkap-ajukan-sengketa-non-litigasi/

http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3463:sidang-pemeriksaan-penyelesaian-sengketa-peraturan-perundang-undangan-puu-melalui-jalur-non-litigasi-terkait-korban-salah-tangkap&catid=268&Itemid=73

JURNAL HUKUM SASANA | Volume 8 Number 1, June 2022

Penyelesaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Penetapan Praperadilan…

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Penyelesaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Penetapan Praperadilan: Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. (2024). Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v8i1.1250