Juvenile Apprehension and Prosecution Process of Indonesia and Philippines: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v10i1.1568Keywords:
Juvenile Apprehension, Juvenile Prosecution, Philippines and IndonesiaAbstract
This study aims to compare find out the similarities and differences of the Juvenile Apprehension Prosecution Process of the Philippines and Indonesia. The researchers utilized the descriptive comparative analysis in conducting this study. This research is conducted using secondary data by utilizing the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No. 11 of 2012 of Indonesia as sources. The researcher has the following criteria in comparing if there are provisions under the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No.11 of 2012 of Indonesia that provides for the (a) Apprehension Process (b) Prosecution Process and (c) Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding the CICL. The researchers found out that (1) there two (2) similar and (4) different provisions that pertains to the Apprehension Process (2) there are (1) similar and (3) different provisions that pertains to Prosecution Process and (3) that the Republic Act 9344 and Law No. 11 of 2012 have similar provisions that pertains to Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding CICL.
Downloads
References
Susan Young, Ben Greer, and Richard Church, Juvenile delinquency, welfare, justice and therapeutic interventions: a global perspective, (2019).
Simões, M., Martins, J., Monteiro, A.P., Relva, I.C. Juvenile Delinquency (2024).
Jiaqi Dong , Analysis Of Economic Factors in Juvenile Delinquency, (2023)
Charles Tumbo, J. Birech, The Influence of Competency Level of Staff and Rehabilitation Programmes in Controlling Juvenile Delinquency in Kenya, (2019)
Julianto Asis and M. Irwan, Protecting the Rights of Children in the Indonesian Juvenile Justice System, (2019)
Indah Rufiatun, Juvenile Delinquency Criminogenic Factor, (2021)
Nashriana, Nashriana & Banjarani, Desia & Rosario, Marwin & Novianti, Vera. (2023). Enhancing Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Exploring Diversion Implementation for Effective Juvenile Delinquency Settlement. Sriwijaya Law Review. 7. 318. 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2427.pp318-334.
RhemRick, Corpuz, Kyla Beatrice, C. Yutuc, Saynoding L. Dimaronsing, Shan Nico, G. Meneses, THE MODERATING EFFECT OF PARENTING STYLES TOWARDS THE RELATIONSHIP OF SELF-ESTEEM AND FRIENDSHIP QUALITY ON JUVENILE DELINQUENCY IN ANGELES CITY, (2023)
Dao, L. T., Duy, L. H. T., Sornprohm, U., & Dandurand, Y. (2022). Diversion and restorative justice in the context of juvenile justice reforms in Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines and Vietnam. International Journal of Restorative Justice (2589-0891), 5(2).
De Luna, D. P., Valdez, M. L. A., & Diaz, C. C. H. (2020). Illegal Drug offenses among Children in Batangas, Philippines: A Narrative Introspection.
Tegan George, What Is a Theoretical Framework? | Guide to Organizing, (2023)
Miri, Seyed Mojtaba & Dehdashti Shahrokh, Zohreh. (2019). A Short Introduction to Comparative Research.
Muhammad Hassan, Descriptive Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples, (2024)
Hillier,Will, What Is Secondary Data? A Complete Guide., (2022)
Republic Act 9344 Comprehensive Juvenile Justice System And Welfare Act of 2006. Republic of the Philippines
Undang Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Republik Indonesia, 2012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Johndex Villarico, Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, Hipolito B. Quillip Jr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
_-_Copy1.jpg)
