Dialektika Hubungan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positive Legislator dengan Pembentuk Undang-Undang dalam Proses Legislasi

Labib Muttaqin; Nuria Siswi Enggarani; Nunik Nurhayati; M. Juanidi; Nabilla Febiyanti

doi:10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4486

Authors

Labib Muttaqin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Nuria Siswi Enggarani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Nunik Nurhayati Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
M. Juanidi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Nabilla Febiyanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4486

Keywords:

Mahkamah Konstitusi, Positive Legislator, Pembentuk Undang-Undang, Konflik

Abstract

Studi ini menganalisis perluasan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dari negative legislator menjadi positive legislator yang berpotensi menimbulkan konflik dengan lembaga pembentuk undang-undang, yaitu DPR dan Presiden. Fokus kajian ini meliputi legitimasi MK dalam membuat putusan positive legislator, konflik yang muncul dengan pembentuk undang-undang akibat putusan tersebut, serta solusi untuk meredam konflik tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dengan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui literature review. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa putusan MK yang bersifat positive legislator, seperti Putusan No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, Putusan No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024, dan Putusan No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024, telah memicu ketegangan dengan pembentuk undang-undang. Untuk mencegah konflik serupa, diperlukan kesepahaman antara MK, DPR, dan Presiden mengenai batas kewenangan MK dalam membuat putusan positive legislator serta mekanisme tindak lanjut putusan tersebut oleh pembentuk undang-undang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almunawar, Agil. “Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Pemisahan Pemilu Nasional Dan Lokal.” Jurnal Hukum Berkeadaban 1, no. 1 (2025): 18–25.

Bickel, Alexander M. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 75. Yale University Press, 1986. https://doi.org/10.2307/794870.

Butt, Simon. “The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia.” The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia 15, no. 1 (2015): 1–312. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598.

Hadi, Sudharto P, Rizkiana S Hamdani, and Ali Roziqin. “A Sustainability Review on the Indonesian Job Creation Law.” Heliyon 9, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13431.

Huda, Ni’matul. Formulasi Konsep Tindak Lanjut Putusan Pengujian Undang-Undang Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Bersifat Mengatur. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Perkara, dan Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2019.

Islami, Muhammad Fahmi. “A Juridical Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024: The Separation of National and Regional Elections from a Constitutional Perspective.” Nusantara: Journal Law and Islamic Law 1, no. 1 (2025): 45–53.

Jafar, Kamaruddin. “Menguji ’Positive Legislature’sebagai Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Halu Oleo Law Review 1, no. 2 (2017): 246–51.

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russsel & Russel, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203790960.

Librayanto, Romi. “Perspektif Hukum Refleksif Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 102/Puu-Vii/2009.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Amanna Gappa 20, no. 3 (2012).

liputan6.com. “Demo ‘Peringatan Darurat’: Aksi Besar-Besaran Tolak Revisi UU Pilkada Dan Link CCTV Untuk Memantau,” 2024. https://www.liputan6.com/hot/read/5680651/demo-peringatan-darurat-aksi-besar-besaran-tolak-revisi-uu-pilkada-dan-link-cctv-untuk-memantau.

Martitah. Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature Ke Positive Lagislature ? Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2013.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.

MD, Moh. Mahfud. “Rambu Pembatas Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 4 (2009): 441–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss4.art1.

Meuwese, Anne C.M., and Stijn van Voorst. “Regulatory Impact Assessment in Legal Studies.” In Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment, 21–32. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782549567.00013.

Mietzner, Marcus. “Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10, no. 3 (2010): 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800003672.

Muttaqin, Entol Zaenal, and Sahrul Hikam. “Konsep Meaningful Participation Dalam Proses Legislasi Di Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU XVIII/2020.” Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 62–80. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v6i1.4091.

Nurhayati, Yati, Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir, Ifrani, and Parman Komarudin. “Investment in Indonesia After Constitutional Court’s Decision in the Review of Job Creation Law.” Lentera Hukum 9, no. 3 (2022): 435 – 458. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v9i3.32368.

Omara, Andy. “The Indonesian Constitutional Court and the Democratic Institutions in Judicial Review.” Constitutional Review 3, no. 2 (2018): 189. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev323.

Ramadhan, Taufiq, Aidil Azhary Lubis, Esmeralda Susiana Gultom, Indi Aulia, Jelita Mawar Doloksaribu, Nova Lestari Dalimunthe, Syarifah Hannum, and Triska Marsha Olivia. “Spirit Nasionalisme Fenomena ‘Peringatan Darurat’ Terkait Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO. 60/PUU-XXII/2024 & No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024.” AR-RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation 1, no. 2 (2024): 517–20.

Roberto Barroso, Luís. “Countermajoritarian, Representative, and Enlightened: The Roles of Constitutional Courts in Democracies†.” American Journal of Comparative Law 67, no. 1 (2019): 109–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avz009.

Safa’at, Muchamad, and Aan Widiarto. “Conditional Decisions as Instrument Guarding the Supremacy of the Constitution (Analysis of Conditional Decisions of Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2003 – 2017).” Brawijaya Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2021): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.01.06.

Sarifudin, Sarifudin, and Kudrat Abdillah. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/Puu-Viii/2010 Dalam Bingkai Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Yuridis 6, no. 1 (2019): 94. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i1.788.

Steamer, Robert J., and Christopher Wolfe. The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-Made Law. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 102. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151497.

Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. “Constitutional Disobedience Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Kajian Terhadap Perppu Cipta Kerja.” Constitution Journal 2, no. 1 (2023): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.35719/constitution.v2i1.50.

Umra, Sri Indriyani and Faisal, F. “Dampak Putusan Inkonstitusional Bersyarat Terhadap Kepastian Hukum.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 6 (2023): 7297–7307.

Yudhistira, Dhieno, and Boy Nurdin. “Dynamics of Legal Politics after Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Regarding the Party Wholesale System in the 2024 Regional Head Elections.” Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science 4, no. 3 (2024): 129–36. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v4i3.1039.