Digital Evidence in Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Legal Analysis Between Indonesia and The Philippines in Cybercrime Cases

Juhaimen Sumala; Donasto Samosir; Adhalia Septia Saputri

doi:10.31599/krtha.v20i2.5484

Authors

Juhaimen Sumala University of Mindanao
Donasto Samosir Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Adhalia Septia Saputri Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v20i2.5484

Keywords:

Digital Evidence, Criminal Procedure, Cybercrime, Indonesia, Philippines

Abstract

The acceleration of digital technology development has fundamentally altered the patterns and characteristics of criminal conduct, particularly with the rise of cybercrime that relies predominantly on electronic data as evidence. This shift creates significant challenges within criminal procedural law, especially concerning the admissibility, verification, and credibility of digital evidence in judicial proceedings. This study aims to examine and compare the legal frameworks regulating digital evidence in Indonesia and the Philippines, with an emphasis on procedural aspects in criminal justice systems. The research adopts a normative juridical method utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal structure, primarily regulated by the ITE Law and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), remains fragmented and lacks detailed procedural guidelines for handling digital evidence. Conversely, the Philippines demonstrates a more coherent and systematic framework through the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and the Rules on Electronic Evidence, particularly in ensuring forensic validation and maintaining chain of custody. The originality of this research lies in its comparative focus on procedural differences and its proposal for an integrated legal framework model for Indonesia. The study underscores the urgency of legal reform to enhance evidentiary standards and ensure consistency between substantive and procedural law. Ultimately, strengthening the regulatory framework is essential to guarantee legal certainty and improve the effectiveness of cybercrime law enforcement.

References

Benny Sumardiana et al., Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Justice, Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024).

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, decisions on electronic evidence admissibility and privacy rights (compiled jurisprudence, 2021–2024).

Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016.

Dyah Ochtorina Susanti & A’an Efendi, Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research) (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022).

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2021).

European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), Electronic Evidence and Digital Forensics: Challenges and Opportunities (ENISA, 2023).

------------------------------------------------------------------. Lorraine V. Aragon, “Digital Evidence and Standards of Proof in Cybercrime Cases”. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. (2021).

INTERPOL, Global Guidelines for Digital Forensics Laboratories and Cybercrime Investigations (INTERPOL, 2022).

----------------. Council of Europe, Electronic Evidence and Criminal Justice: Updated Frameworks (2021–2023 reports).

Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2022).

Jonathan Clough, Principles of Cybercrime (3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, updated discussions 2022); UNODC, Cybercrime in the Digital Age: Recent Developments and Emerging Threats (2023).

Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), provisions on electronic evidence.

Law No. 1 of 2024 concerning Amendments to the ITE Law.

Lawrence M. Friedman, Law and Society: An Introduction (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana, 2021).

Rita Komalasari & Cecep Mustafa, Electronic Evidence in Justice System, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 12 No. 3 (2023).

Mahrus Ali, Digital Evidence dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia, Jurnal RechtsVinding Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022).

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Guidelines on Mobile Device Forensics, NIST Special Publication 800-101 Rev.1 (2022).

OECD, Cybercrime and Digital Evidence (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023).

Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012); Supreme Court of the Philippines, administrative circulars and e-court developments (2020–2024).

Supreme Court Decision No. 108 PK/Pid.Sus/2022.

------------------------------. No. 574 K/Pid.Sus/2021.

------------------------------. Decisions involving cybercrime and electronic evidence (jurisprudential trends, 2020–2024).

Supreme Court of the Philippines, jurisprudence on constitutional limits in cyberspace and digital surveillance (2021–2024).

-----------------------------------------. Decisions on electronic evidence and cybercrime prosecutions (2020–2024 jurisprudence).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Digital Evidence and Cybercrime (Vienna: United Nations, 2024).

-------------------------------------------------------------------. Cybercrime in the Digital Age: Recent Developments and Emerging Threats (United Nations, 2023).

Widodo Ekatjahjana, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021).